Legal Opinion

State v. Irving

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1990No. 18015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Michael Irving entered a conditional plea of guilty to the misdemeanor charge of driving while under the influence, reserving the right to appeal from the magistrate’s denial of his motion for continuance. I.C.R. 11(a)(2). The district court, acting as an appellate court, affirmed the magistrate’s order denying Irving’s motion. Appealing again, Irving contends the magistrate erred in denying his motion for continuance. For reasons expressed below, we affirm.

When considering an appeal from the district court, acting in its appellate capacity, we review the record independently…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Salazar v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. HayesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of CummingsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. GarnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. CaldrerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. SlaninkaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API