Legal Opinion
Krutel v. Stolberg
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 28, 1978No. 77-510PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for recission of a contract purchase of stock representing a one-third interest in certain business. The complaint, as amended, was in five counts. The first count sought damages for breach of contract. Count II claimed damages for fraud. Count III sought recission on equitable grounds. Counts IV and V sought recission, and recovery from defendants of the sums paid by the plaintiff, under Chapter 517, Florida Statutes (1975), for alleged violation of provisions against sale of unregistered stock (§ 517.07) and for sale of stock by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Rood Company v. BD. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE CTY.Supreme Court of Florida · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Watson v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Krasny v. RichterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Popper v. Havana Publications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weinberg v. PenningtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985