Ross v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme" Court, Bronx County (Paul Victor, J.), entered on or about September 20, 2001, which granted defendants’ motion for *233summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants concede that the motion court’s rationale for dismissal was erroneous, but offer alternative arguments for affirmance of the ordered dismissal, which are properly before us and which we address. Social Services Law § 419 provides that “the removal or keeping of a child pursuant to [that] title” is cloaked in “immunity from any liability, civil or criminal,” and that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Emrik v. Chemung County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Kubik v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Lara v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sean M. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lentini v. PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- McLean v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2007