Legal Opinion

Berry v. Springdale Water & Sewer Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 1982No. 81-266Published

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This case must be affirmed because of flagrant deficiencies in the appellants’ abstract of the record. Rule 9 (d) requires that the abstract consist of an impartial condensation of such parts of the record as are necessary to an understanding of all questions presented for decision. In scores of cases we have discussed the essentials of a proper abstract of the record. In the case at bar the following statement from Collins v. Duncan, 257 Ark. 722, 520 S.W.2d 192 (1975), is especially pertinent: "A good rule of thumb would be for an attorney to forget that he knows…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Collins v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API