Legal Opinion

Popple v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 29, 1992No. 91-3003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Senior Justice.

The trial court adjudicated defendant, Tedd J. Popple, guilty of possession of cocaine and of possession of drug paraphernalia after he had pled nolo contendere and reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence. We affirm the judgment below and the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress.

State’s witness, Officer Tim Wilmoth testified at the suppression hearing that on June 4, 1991, at about 12:55 p.m. he was investigating an abandoned stolen car which was located one block from a secluded high crime area. He noticed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lightbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. State v. SimonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. J.C.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. DeBruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API