Dostal v. Magee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
When the action was commenced Magee was nineteen years of age. One Hines had been appointed guardian of his estate. Summons was served upon him on June 16, 1953. It has never been served upon his guardian. No notice of injury has been served.
*511Sec. 262.08 (2), Stats., provides that service of a summons shall be had:
“If against a person for whom a guardian has been appointed, by delivering within the state a copy thereof to such guardian and to the defendant personally.”
This statute, which is in fact a rule of court adopted by authority of the provisions of sec. 251.18, Stats., was adopted after…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grauman, Marx & Cline Co. v. KrienitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Cleveland v. HopkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Block v. BlockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilkins v. DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Estate of Bydalek Ex Rel. Bydalek v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Dostal v. MageeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Dostal v. MageeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Dostal v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.