Legal Opinion

Expansion Gold Mining & Leasing Co. v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 2, 1917No. 8748PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Pueblo District Court. Judge. Hon. C. S. Essex,

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

This action was instituted by the defendant in error (hereafter called the plaintiff) to recover $8,000.00 from the plaintiff in error (hereafter called the defendant), for services rendered as an attorney at law. The complaint contains two counts: The first was for drafting the defendant’s articles of incorporation and assisting in its organization, etc.; the second was for acting as its general counsel for a term of years, and in attending to certain litigation, etc., account being thus employed, etc. The answer denies everything and alleges that if any…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hand v. Inhabitants of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Schreyer v. Turner Flouring Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Tynon v. DespainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Kliegel v. AitkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McArthur v. Times Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Callahan v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  2. Lamon v. ZampSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Lamon v. ZampSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API