Legal Opinion
Goldin Associates, L.L.C. v. Shared Technologies Cellular, Inc. (In Re Shared Technologies Cellular, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 1, 2002No. 19-50167PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY AND OBJECTION TO MOTION
ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
ISSUE
Bankruptcy Code § 502(d) provides, in pertinent part: “[T]he court shall disallow any claim of any entity ... that is a transferee of a transfer avoidable [as a preference] ... unless such entity or transferee has paid the amount ... for which such entity or transferee is liable ....” 1 The ultimate question in this proceeding, after disposing of some preliminary issues, is the interpretation to be placed on this statute when both the transferor and the transferee of a voidable preference…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Sonnax Industries, Inc., Debtor. Sonnax Industries, Inc. v. Tri Component Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Eastern Refractories Co. Inc. v. Forty Eight Insulations Inc. Aycock Inc., Fibrex Inc. And Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- In Re Claude Emery, Debtor. Citibank, N.A. v. Claude EmeryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Petitioning Creditors of Melon Produce, Inc. v. Joseph Braunstein, Trustee, Melon Produce, Inc. v. Peter KargerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Shared Technologies Cellular, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- In Re Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp. (In Re Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2002