Legal Opinion

D.A.O. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 1990No. 88-2376PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

D.A.O. appeals the final order of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS), denying his request for expunction of a report that he had abused T.O., a child. Because we conclude that D.A.O., the uncle of T.O., was not a “person legally responsible for the child’s welfare,” as required by Section 415.503(12), Florida Statutes (1987), we reverse and remand with directions.

The sole issue in this case is whether appellant’s alleged acts of sexual intercourse with the child constitute “child abuse” under section 415.503. Subsection (3) defines “child abuse” as “harm…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Coleman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Shepard v. ThamesSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Stricklen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leet v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Sun Coast Intern. Inc. v. Dept. of Bus. Reg.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Dao v. DhrsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API