Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2005No. 2001-CT-01826-SCTPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

903 So.2d 691 (2005)

Blaine BROOKS

v.

STATE of Mississippi.

No. 2001-CT-01826-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 24, 2005.

Richard M. Goldwasser, and Paul McGerald Luckett, McComb, attorneys for appellant.

Office of the Attorney General by W. Glenn Watts, attorneys for appellee.

EN BANC.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

DICKINSON, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. The following testimony was provided by Detective Robert Holmes in the murder prosecution of Blaine Brooks:

I felt I had just a limited amount of time, before he was appointed an attorney, to try to conduct a lineup. And that's what I did.... Because ...…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Rickey Portis v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  3. James L. Johnson, Jr. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  5. Lattimore v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API