Sandt v. Hylen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This is the second appeal which challenges the validity of attempts by the county board of Blue Earth County to establish the improve*499ment of County Ditch No. 27.1 The issues raised, are, first, whether property owners not assessed for the original construction in 1911 may now be assessed if found to be benefited; and, second, whether the engineer’s fees incurred in the prior proceeding reviewed by us must be paid by these petitioners.
1. Minn. St. 106.501, subd. 2, specifically provides that in ditch improvement proceedings “[t]he benefits and damages determined shall be such as result from…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Oldenborg v. HylenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hylen v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hylen v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977