Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Floriano

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1976No. 8226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Instead of filing a brief respondent’s counsel of record filed a “response to appellant’s opening brief” wherein he informed this court that respondent did not wish to retain him to pursue the appeal. Counsel then asked us to decide the matter on the record below, as well as the brief filed with the district court.

Respondent’s desire not to pursue this appeal and his failure to have an adequate brief filed with this court amounts to a confession of error. Toiyabe Supply Co. v. Arcade, 74 Nev. 314, 330 P.2d 121 (1958); Paso Builders, Inc. v. Hebard, 83 Nev. 165, 170, 426 P.2d 731…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paso Builders, Inc. v. HebardNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. TOIYABE SUPPLY COMPANY v. Arcade Dress Shops, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Petri v. Sheriff of Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. MacDonald v. KasselNevada Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API