People v. Marion
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions from the Becorder’s Court of Detroit.
1Opinion of the Court
Christiancy, Ch. J.
The plaintiff in error (defendant below) was tried and convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit upon an information charging him with feloniously uttering and publishing as true, a false, forged, and counterfeited letter of attorney, knowing the same to be false, forged, and counterfeited, with the intent to injure and defraud, etc.
The forged letter of attorney is described in the information in the following words: “A certain false, forged, and counterfeited letter of attorney, which said false, forged, and counterfeited letter of attorney purported to be…
2Cited by12 opinions
- People v. MarionMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- People v. Van AlstineMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Abrams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.