Legal Opinion

City of Hallandale v. Meekins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 1970No. 2604, 2605PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

237 So.2d 318 (1970)

CITY OF HALLANDALE, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, E.J. Averman, Jack Lawrence, Russell Wilson, Ernest J. Pinto and James V. O'Leary, As City Commissioners of the City of Hallandale, Florida, and Robert F. Williams, As City Treasurer of the City of Hallandale, Florida, Appellants,

v.

Clifton MEEKINS and Edith F. Meekins, His Wife, and Ralph C. Thompson and Stella R. Thompson, Husband and Wife, Appellees.

CITY OF HALLANDALE, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, E.J. Averman, Jack Lawrence, Russell Wilson, Ernest J. Pinto and James V. O'Leary, As City Commissioners of the City…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Fort Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. City of Fort Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Meyer v. City of Oakland ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  5. Rosche v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Madison County v. FoxxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Investment Corp. of South Florida v. City of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. City of Gainesville v. SEABOARD COASTLINE, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. City of Pembroke Pines v. McConagheyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Bodner v. City of Coral GablesSupreme Court of Florida · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API