Fort Worth City Co. v. Smith Bridge Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE OIROUIT COURT OF.THE UNITED STATES FOR THE • NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. The Smith Bridge Company, a private corporation, incorporated under the laws of Ohio, and having'its domicil in the city of Toledo in that State, brought this action against the Fort 'Worth City Company, incorporated under the laws of, and having its domicil in, the city of Fort Worth in the State of Texas, in the Circuit.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE OIROUIT COURT OF.THE UNITED STATES FOR THE • NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. The Smith Bridge Company, a private corporation, incorporated under the laws of Ohio, and having'its domicil in the city of Toledo in that State, brought this action against the Fort 'Worth City Company, incorporated under the laws of, and having its domicil in, the city of Fort Worth in the State of Texas, in the Circuit. Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas, and alleged that on May 19,1888, the parties entered into a certain contract whereby the bridge company, for the…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
This case having been tried by the court under the statute, We can only inquire whether the facts found in the special findings, considered in connection with the pleadings,- are sufficient to sustain the judgment, and whether any error' was committed upon rulings on matters of law properly preserved' by-bill of exceptions. Two bills of exception were taken, but ¿hey simply present the same questions as the special findings oí fact and the conclusions of law deduced therefrom. A stipulation of counsel as to the evidence bearing on the tenth-finding appears in the record; but of that we cannot…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Green Bay & Minnesota Railroad v. Union Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Tyre & Spring Works Co. v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by25 opinions
- New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Sealy Oil Mill & Mfg. Co. v. Bishop Mfg. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Heinz v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Corning Glass Works v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
- City of Belfast v. Belfast Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.