Legal Opinion

Hunt v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 18, 1888PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Criminal law. Jury and jurors. Charge of court. Evidence. Verdict. Punishment. Witness. Before Judge Van Epps. City court of Atlanta. September term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

Mary L. Hunt was charged, in the city court of Atlanta, with the offence of a misdemeanor, consisting in the commission of a single act of fornication with a married man, whoso name was G. W. Gardner, called in the argument “Doctor” Gardner. The jury found the prisoner guilty. The judge sentenced her, at first, to pay a fine of $250, or serve on the public works for twelve months ; this sentence was subsequently changed to a fine of $100, with an alternative service of five months on the public works.

A motion was made for a new trial, upon several grounds; one of which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Kinnebrew v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  4. Malone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Hardy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. City of Atlanta v. FeeneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. McGee v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API