Legal Opinion

Crisales v. Estrada

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 2012No. BV029174Published

1Opinion of the Court

*Supp. 3Opinion

McKAY, P. ,j.—

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff owned and rented the premises located at 4447 S. Huntington Drive, Los Angeles, California, 90032 (the premises). Plaintiff rented the premises to defendant beginning in August 2003. Under the terms of the lease, the agreed-upon rent was $950 per month payable the first day of each month.1 The tenancy was also governed by a Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract2 and the premises were located within the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles Rent Stabilization Ordinance3 (LARSO). Under the Section 8 contract, defendant was required to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Barrientos v. 1801-1825 MORTON LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles v. Cars 4 CausesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Kinney v. OvertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Adams v. Pacific Bell DirectoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API