State v. Linn
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sievers, Chief Judge.
Dixie A. Linn appeals from a district court order which affirmed her conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol, third offense. On appeal, Linn alleges that the State failed to prove a valid judgment for purposes of enhancement because one of the convictions used by the State was not signed *333by the county court judge. We affirm for three separate reasons detailed hereinafter.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
On December 12, 1993, Dixie A. Linn, who was represented by counsel, entered a guilty plea to the charge of driving under the influence of alcohol. The county court accepted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. ZiembaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Interest of JANebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ErlewineNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LinnNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LinnNebraska Supreme Court · 1995