Brandenburg v. Carmichael
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Fayelte District Court. — IT. E. Taylor, Judge. ActiON in replevin, to recover possession of certain household goods and other chattels. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
1- irregular^' mteivention. F. M. Brandenburg and Enfield Brandenburg were husband and wife. Appellee is the son of said parties. F. M. Brandenburg died testate, in April, 1916. By tlie terms of his will, all of his property, real and personal, passed to his surviving widow, Enfield. The appellee was executor of the estate of the said F. M. Brandenburg. After the death of F. M. Brandenburg, his widow, Enfield, lived with her daughter, Amy, who was at that time the wife of the appellant. All of the personal property involved in this litigation was in the possession of the said widow, at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Blackman v. Baxter, Reed & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Haynes v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Dempsey v. McNabbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
- Rhodes v. StoutSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gross v. HockerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Varvaris v. VarvarisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Luther v. National Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936