Legal Opinion
Muka v. New York State Bar Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Howard A. Zeller, J.
Defendant New York State Bar Association moves to dismiss the amended complaint of plaintiff Betty O. Muka *898on several grounds, including collateral estoppel, res judicata, the Statute of Limitations, and failure to state a cause of action. Mrs. Muka, who appears pro se, has filed an affidavit and exhibits in opposition.
THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
The amended complaint essentially is based upon a conspiracy theory. Paragraph 4 alleges defendant New York State Bar Association on or before March 27, 1975 became “a member of a conspiracy for the purpose of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Morgenthau v. CookeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rudnicki v. McCormackDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
- Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. Sommer & SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sassower v. SignorelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Shreve v. ShreveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Dawson v. CHEYOVICH FAMILY TRUSTIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Robert Marini Builder, Inc. v. RaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Spremo v. BabchikNew York Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.