Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. UTP Corp.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Senior Judge MIRARCHI.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (Department) has filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of the liability of UTP Corporation (UTP), Hauto Valley Estates, Inc. (Hauto Valley) and Blue Ridge Real Estate Company, Inc. (Blue Ridge) (collectively, Defendants) for the subsidence of State Route 54 (Route 54).

On December 5, 1996, the Department commenced the instant original jurisdiction action against the Defendants seeking reimbursement of costs for repairing a subsided portion of Route 54. In the subsequently amended…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Breisch v. Locust Mountain Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Pollock v. Pittsburgh, Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Kahres v. HenryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. A. Rivera v. PSP & Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. A. Rivera v. PSP & Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. C.A. Blesse v. Borough of CoaldaleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. J. Sabater v. PA Insurance Dept.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API