Scott Geraci v. Postal Telegraph Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Defendant in error urges that the judgment below is correct, first, for the reason that the plaintiff having received the telegram at 1:44, it is estopped to claim damages by reason of its failure to accept until 5:15 of the same day. Had it promptly accepted the telegram at 1:44 P. M., it would have been received by the Hartner Produce Company prior to the sale of the car to other parties. Second: That no proper, claim was filed within the 60 day period as required in the endorsement on the back of the telegram. Third: That the telegram of acceptance, transmitted by the plaintiff at 5:13 was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Manier & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Texana CourtneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Blamberg Bros. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Newbern v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928