Larkin v. State

ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORRISON, Judge.

This case was originally reversed for the reason that, as this court then viewed the evidence, the state had failed to prove the value of the trusses embezzled, and the opinion expressed some doúbt as to proof of appropriation.

This court, as now constituted, has again reviewed the reord. We are now of the opinion that the state sufficiently proved the value of the trusses alleged to have been embezzled:.

The state was entitled to establish the allegations of the indictment as to the value of the trusses by showing (1) their market value at the…