Legal Opinion

Geitelsohn v. Citizens' Savings Bank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 15, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from-an affirmance by the General Term of thé City Court of a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, for $1,345.14, the balance of a deposit with interest.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, P. J.

Between August 21, 1886, and December 3, 1889, the plaintiff made thirty-eight deposits with defendant, aggregating $1,262, and withdrew on nine occasions, between March 30, 1887, and January 7, 1890, sums aggregating $320. Thirteen days after the last withdrawal the whole balance with interest, or $990.84, was drawn and the pass-book surrendered. The verdict establishes that this withdrawal was not by the plain-, tiff, and the question in the case is whether the bank is exonerated *576by payment to a stranger having possession of the pass-book and whether it exercised due care to prevent fraud…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Appleby v. . Erie County Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Allen v. . Williamsburgh Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Smith v. . Brooklyn Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Kummel v. Germania Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Gearns v. Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chase v. Waterbury Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  2. Ferguson v. Harlem Savings BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  3. Geitelsohn v. Citizens' Savings BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  4. Geitelsohn v. Citizens' Savings BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1897
  5. Bloom v. Bank for SavingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API