Legal Opinion
Manzo v. Park
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 17, 1952No. 4-9712PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.
This is a controversy between the broker and the owner as to (1) alleged breach of contract by the owner, and (2) damages claimed by the broker. Appellee, Park (broker), recovered judgment against appellant, Mrs. Manzo (owner), for $1,800; and this appeal resulted.
On January 11, 1950, Mrs. Manzo signed a contract with National Business Brokers (trade name of appellee, Park), authorizing Park, a licensed broker, to sell the West Ninth Street Cab Company (sometimes hereinafter called “the property”), then owned or controlled by Mrs. Manzo. That portion of the contract…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Blumenthal v. BridgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Manzo v. BouletSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Pate v. GoyneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Hardwick v. MarshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marchiondo v. ScheckNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- H. M. Seldon Co. v. CarsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Porter v. DeeterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Student Loan Guarantee Foundation of Arkansas, Inc. v. Barnes, Quinn, Flake & Anderson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Earls v. LongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.