Legal Opinion

State v. Wells

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1938No. 27041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Although a number of errors are assigned, the only one commanding serious consideration relates to the omission of the trial court to give to the jury a “not guilty” form of verdict. The circumstances giving rise to such action of the court were as follows:

In the opening argument for the defense, Mr. Morris,' of counsel for the defendant, stated to the jury that the state had proven all the elements constituting the crime of murder in the first degree. While such statement does not appear in the formal record, it was so stated by counsel for defendant in oral argument in this court. Reference…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malone v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Wolff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Shipp v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DinsioOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. State v. BoothTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1962
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API