Legal Opinion

In re Subpoena Duces Tecum

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 20, 1992No. Misc. Nos. 92-009. Civ. A. No. 90-3538 (HAA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRYANT, Senior District Judge.

On February 26, 1992 this court stayed determination of plaintiffs’ motion to compel the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) to produce certain documents, pending a ruling by the Court of Appeals of this Circuit in In Re: Subpoena Served Upon the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secre*2tary of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Nos. 91-5427 & 91-5428 (“Fleet”). On June 26, 1992 the court of appeals decided Fleet, 967 F.2d 630.

First, the Court of Appeals reaffirmed the principle that factual portions of OCC…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  2. In Re Subpoena Served Upon the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Seafirst Corp. v. JenkinsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Principe v. Crossland SavingsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  2. United States Postal Service v. Phelps Dodge Refining Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  3. Hill of Portsmouth Condo v. ParadeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. US Postal Service v. Phelps Dodge Refining Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API