Legal Opinion

Lodato v. Campbell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1938No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 39,841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

The afternoon of February 11, 1936, at the intersection of Grand River avenue and Ink ster road, there was a collision between the automobiles of plaintiff and defendants.

The negligence of defendants was conceded. The court reserved decision on the motion of defendants for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and left such issue to the jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. The court, notwithstanding the verdict, found plaintiff guilty, under his own testimony, of contributory negligence as a matter of law and entered judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kerr v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Halzle v. HargreavesMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Richardson v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Decoopman v. HammondMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Brodie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ann Arbor Construction Co. v. RussMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. MacDonald v. SkorniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Wright v. BarronMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API