Legal Opinion
United States v. Ismael Felipe Arnaiz v. All State Bail Bonds, Inc. And Jerry Miller, Movants-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1988No. 85-1089PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Appellant All State Bail Bonds, Inc. (All State) challenges the jurisdiction of the district court to order All State to return to defendant Arnaiz the collateral and one-half of the premium paid to obtain a corporate surety bond. We reverse the district court’s order regarding the premium, but we affirm its jurisdiction to order the return of the collateral.
We begin with a brief statement of the facts.1 In March of 1984, Arnaiz was indicted on a variety of federal drug charges. He obtained a $250,000 corporate surety bond from All State Bail Bonds, through its agent,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- General Atomic Co. v. United Nuclear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Fulton National Bank of Atlanta v. HozierSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. George B. Parr, Mary Elizabeth Ellis Saenz, Intervenor-Appellant, Clinton Manges, Surety, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Harvey Rubenstein, Bernard C. Sherman, Claimant-Appellant v. City National Bank, Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Capital Tracing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Kil Soo LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jorge RojasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. John James Badger, Capital Tracing, Inc., Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.