James v. State

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Frank James appeals his convictions for Aggravated Battery, a Class B felony 1 and Resisting Law Enforcement, a Class D felony. 2 He argues that there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions and that they violate Indiana's Double Jeopardy Clause. Because we find that there is sufficient evidence to support his convietion for aggravated battery, we affirm that conviction. However, we find that his con-vietion for Resisting Law Enforcement violates the principles of double jeopardy, therefore, we reverse and remand to the trial court to vacate that…