Legal Opinion
Roemen v. United States of America
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 27, 2023No. 4:19-cv-04006Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MICAH ROEMEN, and TOM TEN EYCK, 4:19-CV-4006-LLP Guardian of Morgan Ten Eyck; and MICHELLE TEN EYCK, Guardian of Morgan Ten Eyck, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, DENYING MOTION FOR Vs. RECONSIDERATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT NEUENFELDT, individually and UNKNOWN SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL OF THE UNITED STATES, individually, Defendants. Pending before the Court is a Motion for Reconsideration filed by Defendant United States of America. (Doc. 144). For the following reasons, the Motion for Reconsideration is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bank of Waunakee, a Wisconsin Banking Corporation v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Rothwell Cotton Company, a Texas Corporation v. Rosenthal & Company, a Partnership, and Fgl Commodity Services, Inc., an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.