United States v. John Drotar
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.
This appeal involves an attack upon the imposition of a sentence of five years imprisonment and a denial of probation and parole pursuant to Title 26, Section 7237, 1 United States Code, for possession of marihuana, as cruel and unusual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. John C. KifferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- William James Rummel v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Joseph Charles Gramlich, A/K/A Joseph Charles Harris, James Allen Burch, Myrton Ray Lerstang & Joseph Keven LawlessCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.