Swoope's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
At the audit of the account of the executors, a claim against the testator on an alleged oral guaranty of certain bonds was presented by the receiver of a national bank. To prove the contract, the receiver offered the testimony of two witnesses. The evidence of one of them was excluded on the ground that he was a stockholder of the closed bank and, as a surviving party, incompetent under the Evidence Act: May 23,1887, P. L. 158, section 5 (e), 28 P. S., section 322. The learned auditing judge found that, notwithstanding the receivership and payment of his 100% assessment as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gilbraith's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Foster v. CollnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Crawford v. PyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Kirby v. KirbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Arrott St.-P. Mills Co. v. Way Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re the Estate of McKinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Quein WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Roberts EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Mays' EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Security Trust Co. v. FeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.