Legal Opinion

Patton Ex Rel. Estate of Diem v. Reames

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 28, 2005No. 25960PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This is a lost or missing will case. A probate court jury found that Ann Patton, personal representative of the Estate of Ruth Eleanor Diem, proved by clear and convincing evidence Mary Frances Pallister (Testatrix) did not destroy her original last will and testament with an intent to revoke it. 1 The circuit court affirmed the verdict and Appellants, the nephews and niece of Testatrix, appeal. We certified this case for review from the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, and now affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Testatrix died April 7, 2001, at the age of 89, leaving an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. McCourt by and Through McCourt v. AbernathySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. In Re the Care & Treatment of McCrackenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DallasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Ulmer v. UlmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Ex Parte Wheeler v. Estate of GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Stephens v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Stoneledge At Lake Keowee Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Imk Dev. Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API