Legal Opinion

Cambria Company LLC v. Hirsch Glass Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 2, 2022No. 3:21-cv-10092Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMBRIA COMPANY LLC, Plaintit Civil Action No. 21-10092 (MAS) (LHG) MEMORANDUM OPINION HIRSCH GLASS CORP. d/b/a SPECTRUM QUARTZ, Defendant. SHIPP, District Judge This matter comes before the Court for the construction of claims in Plaintiff Cambria Company LLC’s (“Cambria”) patents,

U.S. Patent No. 9,718,303

(303 Patent”) (ECF No. 1-1), US. Patent No. 9,993,942 (942 Patent”) (ECF No. 1-2), and

U.S. Patent No. 10,300,626

(“626 Patent”) (ECF No. 1-3). Defendant Hirsch Glass Corp. (“Hirsch”) challenges those patents and raises…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API