Legal Opinion

Martiniello v. Robitaille

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 27, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of contract, brought against sureties on a bond given to dissolve an attachment in a prior action, to recover the penal sum of the bond. The defendants in their answers allege that the “ plaintiffs secured their judgment in the original action through fraud and collusion with the principals named in the bond ” — the defendants in the original action. A verdict for the plaintiffs in the penal sum of the bond was directed and the defendants excepted.

These facts were admitted: On August 1, 1929, an action was begun by the plaintiffs in the present action (Louis Martiniello and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. White v. CrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Blount v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. S. L. Agoos Tanning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Tapley v. GoodsellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Rogan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. García v. Commonwealth Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  4. Powers Regulator Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Micah A. Curtis & Angela L. Curtis and Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Jerry Lee Rhodes & Bonnie M. CochranWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API