Liberty Lumber Co. v. Pye
Nassau County District Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernard Tomson, J.
In this action for goods sold and
delivered, the oral answer reads:
‘ ‘ 1. General Denial
“ 2. That the defendant is not a partnership but a corporation formed under and pursuant to the Laws State of New York.”
In effect, the defendants have pleaded affirmatively what they sought to prove, i.e., that they acted as agents for a disclosed principal, to wit, the corporation, and are not liable either as individuals or as partners. The sole remaining question here, all other matters having been determined in favor of the plaintiff, involves placing the burden of persuasion as to the second defense.
A…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cobb v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Lavine v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Conkling v. . WeatherwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matsko v. DallyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Judith Garden, Inc. v. MapelCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Central Stone Co. v. John Ruggiero, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1966