Paddock v. St. Croix Boom Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. Points and Authorities for Appellants. 1. The charter provides that where disagreements arise respecting the damage, the question shall be referred, &c., and that the assessment made by the referees shall be taken to be true unless an appeal be taken to the District Court within thirty days after, &c.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. Points and Authorities for Appellants. 1. The charter provides that where disagreements arise respecting the damage, the question shall be referred, &c., and that the assessment made by the referees shall be taken to be true unless an appeal be taken to the District Court within thirty days after, &c. Special Laws, 1856. No right of appeal is conferred by this section; the Legislature obviously supposed that it was provided for by some other law, and hence did not confer the right here or intend to do so. "We find no other law covering the…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Atwater, J.
The St. Croix Boom Corporation Association, organized under an act of the legislature of the Territory of Minnesota, approved February 27th, 1856, entered upon and occupied for the purposes of their business, certain lands belonging to Nespondents, (as appears by the papers in the case,) lying upon the St. Croix. A dispute having arisen between the Nespondents and the Corporation^ to the *279value of the same, aud the damages sustained by reason of such entry and occupation, referees were chosen under the provisions of said act to determine the value of the premises and…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Tierney v. DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864