Ambrister v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
JOANOS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted on a charge of carrying a concealed firearm, and raises *44two points on appeal. Appellant alleges the trial court erred first, in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, and second, in refusing to instruct the jury on his defense of necessity. We affirm on the first point and reverse on the second.
The charge against appellant stemmed from information given to Officer Schultz of the Tallahassee Police Department by a confidential informant, regarding appellant’s alleged involvement in drug sales. The confidential informant was directed by the police to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Holley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Pope v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Mungin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Muro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marrero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- State v. P.P.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000