Legal Opinion

Lankford v. Dockery

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1951No. 33663PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

The defendants in error have moved to strike the executors of the will of J. H. Milhollin, and N. E. Holton, as parties defendant to the writ of error, on the ground that the record shows that there has been no final judgment in the trial court as to these defendants in error, and that as to them the case remains pending in the trial court. “All formal parties to the pleadings in the trial court are proper parties to a writ of error." Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Griffith, 111 Ga. 551 (1 b), (36 S. E. 859). It appears from the record that the parties who ask that their names be stricken…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Kollock v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. McGaughey Bros. v. LathamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Morgan v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Hawley v. MowattColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Jones v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Lankford v. DockeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API