Legal Opinion

Aikens v. Lash

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 23, 1974No. Civ. A. 72 S 129PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and OPINION

GRANT, District Judge.

This civil rights action, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, was brought in forma pauperis under Title 42, § 1983 et seq., by nine (9) plaintiffs, all of whom were then inmates of the Indiana State Prison who had been transferred to that Prison from the Indiana Reformatory. Defendants Lash, Moore and Devero are the Warden, the Assistant Warden and the Director of Classification, respectively, of the Indiana State Prison at Michigan City, Indiana. Defendant Phend is the Superintendent, and Defendant Schroeder, the Assistant Superintendent of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Thomas Crowder v. Russell E. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Laaman v. HelgemoeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Owen v. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Aikens v. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. Marvin Lee Aikens v. Leo D. Jenkins, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API