Legal Opinion

Nan E. Matthews v. Worthen Bank & Trust Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1984No. 83-2354PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Nan Matthews brought this suit in district court 1 alleging that Worthen Bank (Worthen) violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. At the conclusion of Matthews’s case, the district court directed a verdict in favor of Worthen. We affirm.

Matthews attempted to purchase a liquor store and lease space in the Mini Mall. The Mini Mall shopping center is owned by a partnership composed of Barbara and John Baber and Jean Cross. The partnership had an outstanding loan with Worthen. The main source of funds for repayment of the loan was the rent from the Mini Mall leases.

Th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boothe v. TRW Credit DataDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Minnesota Farm Bureau Marketing Corp. v. North Dakota Agricultural Marketing Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Vincent J. Ippolito, Cross-Appellants v. Wns, Inc., and Equifax Services, Inc., Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Leslie K. Spence v. Trw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Carl A. Bredberg and Diane Bredberg v. Dean Long, Nelda Long, and Realife, Inc., D/B/A Realife RanchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Zeller v. SamiaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  5. Grigoryan v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API