Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2007No. 46942PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Parraguirre, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether Nevada’s double jeopardy protections prohibit increasing a defendant’s sentence after the defendant’s conviction has been partially vacated on appeal. We first considered a similar issue in Dolby v. State, where we held: “When a court is forced to vacate an unlawful sentence on one count, the court may not increase a lawful sentence on a separate count.” We now conclude that the double jeopardy protections articulated in Dolby apply with equal force regardless of the procedural posture in which the resentencing occurs —…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Stevie Dewayne HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State v. GoncalvesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  4. Stephans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API