Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rock v. Thompson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1981No. 54408Published

1Dissent

MR. JUSTICE MORAN,

also dissenting:

In addition to joining the dissents of Mr. Justice Underwood and Mr. Justice Ryan, I submit the following reasons as to why mandamus is an inappropriate remedy in this case.

Article VI, section 4, of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 empowers this court to exercise original jurisdiction in cases relating to mandamus. The traditional use of the writ of mandamus has been to compel the officer to whom it is addressed to perform a ministerial duty which he has failed to perform. (People ex rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Clark (1957), 12 Ill. 2d 515,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. People Ex Rel. Ward v. MoranIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People ex rel. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DonovanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People Ex Rel. Ward v. SalterIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People ex rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API