Legal Opinion
United States v. Petroleum Navigation Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 13, 1936No. Nos. 352, 353PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
Following a collision at sea off Cape Henry, Va.,' in the evening of May 2, 1931, between the steamship Papoose of the Petroleum Navigation Company and the U. S. S. Wright, an airplane tender, in which both vessels were considerably damaged, the government sued the Papoose in rem-The Petroleum Navigation Company ap>peared as claimant and also filed a cross-libel charging the Wright with all fault which occasioned the collision. The Papoose was found grossly at fault and, though the Wright failed to sound fog signals under the circumstances about to* be related and that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Belden v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- The MartelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The William H. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- The Silver PalmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- The Edward E. LoomisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Silver Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Universe Tankships, Inc. v. Pyrate Tank Cleaners, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.