Legal Opinion

Arthur C. Banks, Res/cross-app V. City Of Tacoma, App/cross-res.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 2, 2021No. 52072-9Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON Division Two DIVISION II June 2, 2021 ARTHUR C. BANKS, an individual; TONEY No. 52072-9-II MONTGOMERY, an individual; and WHITNEY BRADY, an individual, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF TACOMA, a municipal corporation, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant/Cross-Respondent. GLASGOW, A.C.J.—Four Tacoma residents jointly requested records under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW, from the City of Tacoma Police Department about its use of cell site simulators, which allow the Department, with a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brand v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Brand v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API