Legal Opinion

Peninsula Shipbuilding Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 5741Published

During the years 1918, 1919, and 1920, the petitioner was engaged in building wooden ships for the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation on a cost plus fixed fee basis, the contracts under which the work was being done providing that depreciation of plant and equipment was to be considered an element of cost.

Read the full summary

During the years 1918, 1919, and 1920, the petitioner was engaged in building wooden ships for the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation on a cost plus fixed fee basis, the contracts under which the work was being done providing that depreciation of plant and equipment was to be considered an element of cost. Held, that the petitioner was not entitled to deduct from gross income, in its tax returns for the years 1918, 1919, and 1920, amounts for amortization of property which were reimbursed to the petitioner in 1923.

1Opinion of the Court

APPEAL OF PENINSULA SHIPBUILDING CO.

Peninsula Shipbuilding Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 5741.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

5 B.T.A. 739; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2793;

December 8, 1926, Promulgated

During the years 1918, 1919, and 1920, the petitioner was engaged in building wooden ships for the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation on a cost plus fixed fee basis, the contracts under which the work was being done providing that depreciation of plant and equipment was to be considered an element of cost. Held, that the petitioner was not entitled to deduct from gross income, in its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Appeal of Peninsula Shipbuilding Co.United States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API