Hicks v. Brown Estate
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
1. There being evidence to support the verdict rendered, this court can not say that the trial judge erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.
2. There being no assignment in the final bill of exceptions either upon- the exceptions pendente lite or upon the rulings excepted to therein, no question is presented for decision under the exceptions pendente lite. Ga. L. 1921, p. 232 (Michie’s Code (1926), § 6139 (1)); Alexander v. Chipstead, 152 Ga. 851 (111 S. E. 552); House v. American Discount Co., 31 Ga. App. 396 (120 S. E. 701); Atlanta Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 34…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alexander v. ChipsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Atlanta Life Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- House v. American Discount Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Carter v. VanlandinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Browning v. Farmers BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Edenfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Bolton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931