Legal Opinion
United States v. Mayo
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 10, 2011No. 10-1970PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
Douglas Mayo pleaded guilty to traveling in interstate commerce to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor. The district court sentenced him to 46 months’ imprisonment and 15 years of supervised release, with several special conditions that bar the possession of pornography and restrict his access to the Internet and computers in general. He appeals from these special conditions, contending that they are not reasonably related to the offense and result in a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
In early summer 2008, Mayo began…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. StultsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Scott RistineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Derrick CrumeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BostonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. PoitraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Paris HollingshedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Justin DeatherageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Charmar BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.