Legal Opinion

Roe v. Hetherington

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1946No. File 6978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

A statement of the sequence of events is necessary to understand the situation presented by this appeal.

December 24, 1943, the plaintiff, a resident of Iowa, commenced an action in the county court of Cass County, to recover on a promissory note alleged to have been executed by the defendant. The note was not dated but was executed apparently about December 1929, and was due ‘.‘March first, after date.”

The summons and the complaint were served upon the defendant, a resident of Burleigh County in the employ of the railway company. The record shows he has resided in this State ever since the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Plater v. W. C. Mullins Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Schott v. EnanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Crecelius v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. Fire Ass'n v. ZornSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bogart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Peddicord v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NagleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hetherington v. RoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NagleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API